<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article: Introducing Behaviour-Driven Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/</link>
	<description>embracing uncertainty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Buckley - Random musings on life, work and software development. &#187; Testing java code using rspec and jruby</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/#comment-7774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Buckley - Random musings on life, work and software development. &#187; Testing java code using rspec and jruby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/archives/31#comment-7774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A couple of months ago, Dan North made this comment on the subject of rspec: I’m a big fan of Ruby, and I like some of the ideas behind rspec. However I’ve been working with Niclas Nilsson on a Ruby port of JBehave called RBehave, which we think conveys the intent of BDD more clearly. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of months ago, Dan North made this comment on the subject of rspec: I’m a big fan of Ruby, and I like some of the ideas behind rspec. However I’ve been working with Niclas Nilsson on a Ruby port of JBehave called RBehave, which we think conveys the intent of BDD more clearly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Done means Done - Acceptance Testing using Behaviour Driven Development. at Al Power</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/#comment-7773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[When Done means Done - Acceptance Testing using Behaviour Driven Development. at Al Power]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 03:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/archives/31#comment-7773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Dan showed an example of writing an acceptance test using JBehave (his replacement for JUnit which removed any reference to testing and replaced it with a vocabulary built around verifying behaviour - Behaviour Driven Development). This was something like (roughly from memory - pretty much made up so any errors are mine!): [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan showed an example of writing an acceptance test using JBehave (his replacement for JUnit which removed any reference to testing and replaced it with a vocabulary built around verifying behaviour &#8211; Behaviour Driven Development). This was something like (roughly from memory &#8211; pretty much made up so any errors are mine!): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AI3 - Adaptive Information:::</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/#comment-7772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AI3 - Adaptive Information:::]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/archives/31#comment-7772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behavior-driven Development (BDD)...

Getting the Words Right
There has been some laudable progress in test-driven development (TDD), leading to what is now being touted as &#8220;behaviour-driven development&#8221; (note the English spelling).  Two key proponents of this approach have bee...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behavior-driven Development (BDD)&#8230;</p>
<p>Getting the Words Right<br />
There has been some laudable progress in test-driven development (TDD), leading to what is now being touted as &#8220;behaviour-driven development&#8221; (note the English spelling).  Two key proponents of this approach have bee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan North</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/#comment-7771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan North]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/archives/31#comment-7771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JBehave is back under active development, with a small team of committers (rather than just me). You can expect to see some point releases in the next few weeks.

I&#039;m a big fan of Ruby, and I like some of the ideas behind rspec. However I&#039;ve been working with &lt;a href=&#039;http://niclasnilsson.se&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Niclas Nilsson&lt;/a&gt; on a Ruby port of JBehave called RBehave, which we think conveys the intent of BDD more clearly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JBehave is back under active development, with a small team of committers (rather than just me). You can expect to see some point releases in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of Ruby, and I like some of the ideas behind rspec. However I&#8217;ve been working with <a href='http://niclasnilsson.se' rel="nofollow">Niclas Nilsson</a> on a Ruby port of JBehave called RBehave, which we think conveys the intent of BDD more clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Buckley</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2006/10/20/article-introducing-behaviour-driven-development/#comment-7770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry Buckley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/archives/31#comment-7770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for making the article available - it appeared in the issue of Better Software just before I subscribed, and I&#039;d been looking for it online. Is JBehave still under active development, or have the cool kids all jumped ship to Ruby and the excellent rspec?

Incidentally, I came up with an alternative approach to AgileDox which (IMO) produces more usable output if you have a large class hierarchy:

http://www.kerrybuckley.com/2006/09/25/an-alternative-approach-to-creating-specs-from-junit-tests/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making the article available &#8211; it appeared in the issue of Better Software just before I subscribed, and I&#8217;d been looking for it online. Is JBehave still under active development, or have the cool kids all jumped ship to Ruby and the excellent rspec?</p>
<p>Incidentally, I came up with an alternative approach to AgileDox which (IMO) produces more usable output if you have a large class hierarchy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kerrybuckley.com/2006/09/25/an-alternative-approach-to-creating-specs-from-junit-tests/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kerrybuckley.com/2006/09/25/an-alternative-approach-to-creating-specs-from-junit-tests/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

