<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two flavours of BDD - or .net gets behaviour-driven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven</link>
	<description>It's all behaviour</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: chiz</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-9621</link>
		<dc:creator>chiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-9621</guid>
		<description>Good post. You make some great points that most people do not fully understand.

"rbehave has a different motivation, namely moving from the textual representation of a story to an executable definition in as few steps as possible. This is to allow human beings – mainly testers and business analysts – to read, write and edit executable acceptance criteria."

I like how you explained that. Very helpful. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. You make some great points that most people do not fully understand.</p>
<p>&#8220;rbehave has a different motivation, namely moving from the textual representation of a story to an executable definition in as few steps as possible. This is to allow human beings – mainly testers and business analysts – to read, write and edit executable acceptance criteria.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like how you explained that. Very helpful. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelons Montalvo</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelons Montalvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-5083</guid>
		<description>Looks like AgileJoe integrated his framework with BehaveSharp:

http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/07/27/good-bye-nunit-behave-hello-behave.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like AgileJoe integrated his framework with BehaveSharp:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/07/27/good-bye-nunit-behave-hello-behave.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/07/27/good-bye-nunit-behave-hello-behave.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Disco Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The weekly bag&#8211; June 29</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Disco Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The weekly bag&#8211; June 29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>[...] Two flavours of BDD - or .net gets behaviour-driven- BDD for .NET, baby. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two flavours of BDD &#8211; or .net gets behaviour-driven- BDD for .NET, baby. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ocampo</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4917</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ocampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 04:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan!

I agree that I should get with Morgan to see if we can create one framework (If the community accepts my approach) because frankly I am confusing myself with every new BDD framework that is being created.  Simplicity and consolidation are the way to go.

On a side note I updated my post with the latest changes.  Not bad but I wanted to make sure I stayed true to your vision of rbehave.  Let me know what you think.

http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan!</p>
<p>I agree that I should get with Morgan to see if we can create one framework (If the community accepts my approach) because frankly I am confusing myself with every new BDD framework that is being created.  Simplicity and consolidation are the way to go.</p>
<p>On a side note I updated my post with the latest changes.  Not bad but I wanted to make sure I stayed true to your vision of rbehave.  Let me know what you think.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.agilejoe.com/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Two flavours of BDD - or .net gets behaviour-driven</title>
		<link>http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4910</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Two flavours of BDD - or .net gets behaviour-driven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dannorth.net/2007/06/two-flavours-of-bdd-or-net-gets-behaviour-driven#comment-4910</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Dan North [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Dan North [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
